Monday, June 17, 2013
Other events relating to Crete on 22 May 1941
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
The situation Crete deteriorates during late 22 May and early 23 May 1941
Monday, June 10, 2013
Late on 22 May 1941 in the Prison Valley on Crete
Starting at about 3pm on 22 May 1941, the New Zealand 19th Battalion had attacked towards an old Turkish fort in the Prison Valley on Crete. They were repulsed with the loss of 12 men. In return, the Germans launched counter-attack towards Galatas at about 7pm. Kippenberger's troops immediately attacked the group. Some Greeks that were nearby, commanded by Captain Forrester, charged towards the Germans, yelling and screaming. That broke the German advance and they withdrew.
In the vicinity of the Maleme airfield, an attack had been planned, but when the New Zealand Division commander realized that there was a German group holding the coast road between the 4th and 5th New Zealand Brigades, he changed his mind. That evening, the decision was made to withdraw from the area near the Maleme airfield and to cede the ground to the Germans. The Australian Official History says that this was in recognition that the battle for Crete was lost. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Thursday, June 06, 2013
Were the Germans withdrawing? 22 May 1941 on Crete
At Brigadier Hargest's 5th New Zealand Brigade headquarters, there was a suggestion that the Germans might be withdrawing troops by transport aircraft. The suggestion was prompted by thoughts about German troops running to aircraft as they landed at Maleme. Someone had thought that the troops might be running to the Ju-52 transports to board them to be able to leave. The truth seems to be that the aircraft were landing under fire. Brave men were running to the Ju-52 transport aircraft to unload them as quickly as possible, in case that they would be hit by shellfire.
To test out the idea that the Germans were leaving, the New Zealand division commander, Puttick, ordered Brigadier Kippenberger to probe the enemy in the vicinity of the prison. The patrols encountered heavy resistance, indicating that the Germans were in strength, not reducing their forces. The 19th Battalion had also made an attack towards an old Turkish fort, but was rebuffed by a strong German defense. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Tuesday, June 04, 2013
The situation at Maleme and who was to blame (Crete 1941)
Monday, June 03, 2013
The 28th (Maori) Battalion on 22 May 1941 at Maleme
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Sandy Thomas on the defence of Maleme on 20 and 21 May 1941
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
The 20th Battalion on 22 May 1941
Monday, May 27, 2013
The New Zealanders in action on 22 May 1941 at Maleme
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
22 May 1941 at Maleme
Monday, May 20, 2013
The 2/7th Battalion moves west on 21 May 1941
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
The Greek plan to attack Valona in January 1941
Monday, May 13, 2013
German Strategic Objectives in early 1941
The 2/7th Battalion on 21 and 22 May 1941 on Crete
Tuesday, May 07, 2013
The Australians on Crete during 21 and 22 May 1941
Monday, May 06, 2013
Australians on 21 May 1941 on Crete
Friday, May 03, 2013
The German plan for Crete for 22 May 1941
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
In the prison valley on Crete on 21 May 1941
Monday, April 29, 2013
The German results at sea near Crete by 21 May 1941
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
The German plans for the second day in the attack on Crete
Monday, April 22, 2013
At sea near Crete on 21 May 1941
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
The planned attempt to recapture the airfield at Maleme
Monday, April 15, 2013
21 May 1941 from the Australian Official History
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
More about the first day in the invasion of Crete
Monday, April 08, 2013
Saturday, April 06, 2013
A different topic :Auchinleck versus Rommel
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
21 May 1941 in the morning
Monday, April 01, 2013
Paratroops near the prison on 20 May 1941
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
The force for Canea and Suda Bay
Monday, March 25, 2013
The West Group attack on 20 May 1941
Thursday, March 21, 2013
The German force deployment for Crete
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
More about the original attack plan for Crete in 1941
Sunday, March 17, 2013
General Lohr
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
The XI Air Corps
Monday, March 11, 2013
Airborne attack lessons from Crete
The Germans overreacted to the problems with the airborne attack on Crete and decided to not make such an attack again. I would say that at least Hitler misread the situation. Yes, making a daylight parachute attack on defenders who expect the attack does not work well. The casualties among German paratroops at Crete were high because they were dropped onto defending troops who then shot the paratroops during the descent. The Allies were so impressed by the concept that they formed their own airborne divisions, including parachute-equipped paratroops.
The glider-borne troops were much more successful. They were largely dropped and landed near, not on, the targets to be attacked. A few gliders were dropped too far at sea and were lost with their passengers, but most were able to land on the island. They were in numbers large enough to form cohesive units that were able to capture the airfield at Maleme. After the airfield was secured, transport aircraft were able to bring in a large number of mountain troops who were then able to overwhelm the defending force. The defenders were at a disadvantage due to the poor command communications systems. General Freyberg often was uninformed about the course of the battle, until the battle was lost.
The capture of the bridge over the Corinth canal in Greece in April 1941 was a good example where paratroops were used with the element of surprise. There was considerable secrecy involved (apparently), and the paratroops were dropped and caught the largely undefended area by surprise and took the bridge. To achieve a degree of surprise needed for the successful use of paratroops was why the British and American airborne troops were dropped at night at Normandy in June 1944. The operation still went awry due to the air transports totally ignoring the need for navigation. The paratroops ended up being scattered across Normandy in small parties, not able to reform units.
Now, special forces are dropped by parachute with an eye to achieving surprise and a degree of stealth. That is what is needed for any successful use of parachutists.
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
The German plan for Crete in 1941
Monday, March 04, 2013
Naval support at Crete early in the attack
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Retimo and Heraklion on the first day or so
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The battle for Crete was really lost on the second day
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Near Canea and Suda Bay
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Suda Bay on 20 May 1941
Monday, February 18, 2013
Late on 20 May 1941 on Crete
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Command on 20 May 1941 on Crete suffered from poor communications
Monday, February 11, 2013
The Galatas area on 20 to 21 May 1941
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
The rest of Crete on 20 May 1941
Monday, February 04, 2013
At dawn on 21 May 1941 on Crete
Thursday, January 31, 2013
The 21st NZ Battalion on the slopes: 20-21 May 1941
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
The 23rd New Zealand Battalion at Crete on 20-21 May 1941
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
In the afternoon near Maleme on 20 May 1941
Monday, January 21, 2013
The 22nd NZ Battalion at Maleme airfield
British intelligence predicted an attack on Crete by 17, 18, or 19 May 1941
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
The Germans attack on 20 May 1941
Monday, January 14, 2013
Crete, right before the German attack in 1941
Friday, January 11, 2013
Anti-aircraft gunners right before the invasion of Crete in 1941
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
British intelligence predicted an attack on Crete by 17, 18, or 19 May 1941
Wednesday, January 02, 2013
The troop deployment on Crete on 20 May 1941 was unimpressive
Monday, December 31, 2012
The New Zealand Division expanded on 14 May 1941
Friday, December 28, 2012
The plan for the invasion of Crete in 1941
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Shipping and Air Attacks on Suda Bay May 1941
Saturday, December 22, 2012
the sixty 25pdrs in Egypt in late May 1941
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The gunners prepare in May 1941 on Crete
Monday, December 17, 2012
The artillery situation in early May 1941
Friday, December 14, 2012
British political considerations and leadership
Monday, December 10, 2012
Right before the German invasion of Crete
Right before the German invasion of Crete, there were still some 14,000 Italian prisoners on the island of Crete. The British wanted to transfer them off the island, but the Greeks had hesitated, because they were concerned that the transfer might violate international law. In any case, the prisoners were still there when the Germans invaded.
A small number of reinforcements and equipment had arrived on Crete prior to the German invasion. There were about 2,200 marines and their guns and searchlights. There were also two British infantry battalions, 16 light tanks, and 6 infantry tanks. There were also sent a troop of 3.7in mountain guns. All this was helpful but insufficient to meet the attack that would be launched. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Thursday, December 06, 2012
The Greek King and Government
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
British air strength on Crete on 30 April 1941
The British air strength on Crete at the end of April 1941 was very modest. They were based mainly at Maleme, although one squadron was at Heraklion. The extra RAF personnel were flown to Egypt, consistent with the idea that only defenders should be kept on Crete. Everyone was agreed that Crete should not be allowed to be taken without a fight. The problem was that there were inadequate forces available. The air strength was as follows:
At Heraklion: No. 112 Squadron RAF with 12 Gladiator fighters
At Maleme: No. 30 Squadron RAF with 12 Blenheim day bombers
No. 33/80 Squadron RAF with 6 Hurricane fighters
No. 805 Fleet Air Arm Squadron with 6 Gladiator and Fulmer fighters
When you realize that this modest force would be facing Bf 109 fighters and Ju-88 bombers, you can see that this small air contingent was inadequate to resist a strong air attack in support of an airborne invasion.
Sunday, December 02, 2012
The Crete garrison plan on 8 May 1941
Friday, November 30, 2012
Dispositions for the defence of Crete: 3 May 1941
Monday, November 26, 2012
More about troops on Crete: early May 1941
The main British unit on Crete in early May 1941 was the "fresh" 14th Brigade. They had been the Crete garrison at the time of the Greek operation. After the Greek fiasco, there were also four units built up from withdrawals from Greece: the "Rangers, Northumberland Hussars, 7th Medium Regiment, and 106th ROhal Horse Artillery". There were also men from the mobile naval base, coast artillery, anti-aircraft units, and base units.
There were also some ten thousand Greek troops, of which only three battalions were of any value. The other eight battalions were just recruits. The 5th (Cretan) division had fought in Albania and had been lost in the Greek collapse. General Freyberg had hoped to help organize the Greek troops on Crete, but there was the shortage of arms, equipment and leadership that hampered the effort. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Friday, November 23, 2012
The Australian situation on Crete
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Troops on Greece in early May 1941
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The command situation on Crete in early May 1941
Monday, November 12, 2012
General Freyberg on 4 May 1941
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
General Blamey weighs in: early May 1941
Monday, November 05, 2012
What forces were on Crete? Early May 1941
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
General Freyberg in command on Crete
Monday, October 29, 2012
The situation on 29 April 1941
Friday, October 26, 2012
The Greeks on Crete on 28 April 1941
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The impact of the evacuation from Greece on Crete
In early March 1941, before the Greek situation had unraveled, commanders had foreseen the need to accommodate in Crete as many as 50,000 troops evacuated from Greece. By 17 April, the command in Crete had requested 30,000 "tents, clothing and blankets" for evacuated troops. Troops and civilians brought from Greece started to arrive by 23 April. By 25 April and immediately after, there were 25,000 troops brought to Crete at Suda Bay by warship. There were no tents or even coats for them. Because of the lack of preparation for what many had anticipated, time was lost to prepare defences on Crete. Men sat around, even in organized units that had arrived. There were no tools or any of the normal essentials. After the disaster in Greece, the men relished the time spent doing nothing but resting in Crete.
Once more senior officers arrived on Crete there was more serious consideration about how to prepare for the expected invasion. The existing garrison was positioned. There was a small air condition on the island. There were four squadrons withdrawn from Greece with six or eight Blenheim day bombers, six Hurricane fighters, six Gladiator biplane fighters, one squadron that flew in from Egypt with nine Blenheim bombers, and a Fleet Air Arm squadron.
General Wilson thought that if they wanted to defend Crete, they needed to increase the strength to a greater degree than General Wavell and the other commanders wanted. General Wilson thought that it was a mistake to try and defend Crete with inadequate resources, which was probably true. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Plans for defending Crete in April and May 1941
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Major-General Weston takes over on 26 April 1941
Monday, October 15, 2012
The Island of Crete in May 1941
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Events in April and May 1941
Monday, October 08, 2012
The Iraqi operation in perspective
Thursday, October 04, 2012
Wavell and Auchinleck
I was curious about General Archibald Wavell's background and how that compared with his successor, General Claude Auchinleck. Wavell's father was an army officer, in fact a Major General, and he grew up in India. He followed his father into the army. He quickly accumulated staff officer experience, although he distinguished himself in the Great War in combat and was awarded the Military Cross. He also lost an eye in the process.
General Auchinleck was much more closely aligned with the Indian army and his Great War experience was in the Mespotamian Campaign against the Turks. While Wavell learned Russian before the war, Auchinleck learned Punjabi. Auchinleck commanded troops in combat when Wavell was in a staff officer role. Between the wars, both spent time on half pay. Wavell became a Major General in 1933 while Auchinleck was promoted to that rank in 1935.
Before the beginning of the Second World War, Wavell was head of Southern Command in the UK. He was appointed to command the Middle East in July 1939. He presided over the successful campaign against the Italians in late 1940 until early 1941. That campaign was ended prematurely and in an unsatisfactory way so that Anthony Eden and Churchill's ill-fated adventure in Greece could proceed. Wavell tarnished his reputation in Greece and subsequently in Crete. The Germans, with Erwin Rommel in command, upset the situation in North Africa and that would eventually lead to Wavell's removal.
Aunchinleck was appointed to replace Wavell. We can imagine that he was chosen for his experience in the region. In many ways, Auchinleck lacked the skills to be theater commander. He would have been more comfortable commanding the army fighting the Germans. In fact, Churchill repeatedly urged Auchinleck to do just that. Auchinleck took his role as theater commander seriously and thought that commanding the army in the field would detract from that role. Only twice did Auchinleck take command, and in both cases, he outfought Rommel and saved the situation. Once was in December 1941, when Auchinleck saved the Crusader operation when his choice as army commander, Alan Cunningham, was exhausted after the whirlwind East African campaign. He was not ready to take on command of the army in North Africa, where he had no experience with armoured forces. The second occasion was after the surrender of Tobruk in 1942, when Rommel threatened to advance to the Suez Canal.
Wavell had a better eye for choosing commanders to serve under him, while Auchinleck lacked that ability. However, if you needed an army commanded in a tight situation, you wanted Auchinleck, not Wavell.
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
German aid for the Iraqi's
Starting on 13 May 1941, the Germans had aircraft based at Mosul and Erbil to aid the Iraqi's in their fight against the British. Three German He-111 bombers raided Habbaniyah on 16 May and were able to do considerable damage. The German aircraft lacked the necessary support, however, so there were only one fighter and one bomber still operational by 28 May.
The Iraqi anti-British group were upset at the lack of support by the Germans and Italians. The Iraqis wanted arms and gold. Apparently, any Arab revolt against the British needed to have gold, presumably to buy support. The Germans saw the Iraqi revolt as more of a political event, rather than a real uprising of the Iraqi people against the British. The latter might have actually received substantive support. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Iraq after Habbaniyah in 1941
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Habbiniyah goes on the offensive: early May 1941
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
More details about Iraq in 1941
When a brigade of the 10th Indian Division was diverted to Basra, the oil port, they had been destined for Malaya. They were boarding ship a Karachi when the diversion happened. As we have said, General Auchinleck, was the Commander-in-Chief in India. General Auchinleck had been in that position since January 1941. Since he was considered to be close to the action, he was to be the overall commander.
The Iraqi government of Rashid Ali was getting nervous about the brigade at Basra. They insisted that no more British troops should be sent to Basra until those that were there had moved out. When in late April, more troops arrived at Basra, two Iraqi brigades with artillery and armoured cars surrounded the air base at Habbiniyah. There were about 1,000 men of the RAF there as well as 1,000 British and colonial troops. A British battalion was flown in as reinforcements on 30 April 1941. At that point, the Iraqis were asked to withdraw. Then the Iraqi commander refused, the airbase commander decided to attack the Iraqis from the air with training aircraft fitted with bombs. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Monday, September 17, 2012
Another distraction about the time of the Greek collapse in April-May 1941
Especially in the Middle East, the local people were hostile to the Colonial Powers like Britain. We can imagine that the Iraqi Rashid Ali was encouraged by the British difficulties in Greece and North Africa to harass the British in Iraq. Rashid Ali was influenced by the pro-German Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. A coup d'état overthrew the pro-British regent and installed Rashid Ali as Prime Minister of Iraq. Many of the same themes as in present times were present in 1941. There was the strong Arab nationalist and Islamic fervor that exists now.
The British responded to the coup by sending the 20th Indian Infantry Brigade to Basra, the oil terminal. The next move by the Iraqi government was to send troops to the RAF base at Habbiniyah on the Euphrates. The base was just 50 miles west of Baghdad. The RAF mostly had obsolete aircraft at Habbiniyah that were used for training. They were enough, however, to establish air superiority over the Iraqi air force. Once enough British and Indian Army troops had been sent to Iraq, they were able to overcome the Iraqi Army and lift the siege and capture Falluja and Baghdad. While the action to remove Iraq as a factor continued, it was at an inconvenient time, opposite the end of Greece and the Crete campaign, as well as the fighting in Libya, on the western desert in Cyrenaica. There was also the Tiger Convoy and the need to resupply Malta all happening at the same time.
Friday, September 14, 2012
Iraq became an issue in 1941
Because Britain depended on oil from Iraq, and from "Persia" (what Winston Churchill insisted on calling Iran), they could not afford an interruption to supply. Even in 1940 and 1941, anti-British Arabs were sympathetic to Fascists. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem had a secret plan to cooperate with the Germans and expel the British. Rashid Ali was the leader of the pro-German group in Iraq. The Iraqi army consisted of 50,000 troops commanded by British-trained officers. Rashid Ali became Prime Minister in April 1941. The regent, who was pro-British, Amir Abdul Illah, thought that he would be arrested by Rashid Ali. He fled Iraq by way of Basra, and then ended up in Transjordan.
The British planned to respond by putting a force into Basra, as a starting point. They decided to send a brigade group from the 10th Indian Division. The commander in India was Claude Auchinleck. He would command the Basra operation. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
The situation in March to April 1941 in the Mediterranean
In early April, 1941, the German force in Libya had pushed back the defending troops. After Richard O'Connor had almost defeated the Italians in Libya, the army in eastern Libya was stripped to provide troops for Greece. O'Connor was ill, but available as a consultant. The one bright spot was east Africa, where Alan Cunningham had conducted a brilliant campaign against the Italian and African colonial army.
The commanders in the Middle East were said to have been concerned about defending against a German airborne attack on Greece, but we have a hard time finding any positive steps that were taken with that defence in mind. Dominion troops just removed from Greece were in Crete and would soon have to fight the Germans again, under even more difficult circumstances.
But it was in North Africa, in Cyrenaica (eastern Libya, that the situation had grown critical. The small German force sent to Libya was seen as a blocking force to prevent the British from capturing the rest of Libya without a fight. The wild card was General Rommel, the commander, who had been trained in infiltration tactics in the Great War, and who had experience as a commander of mechanized warfare in May 1940. He was not content with simply being a blocking force. As was his style, he made a personal reconnaissance of the area that was lightly defended and decided to see if he could panic the British and cause them to withdraw. They did panic and withdraw. In the process, Rommel very nearly took Tobruk, the former Italian fortified position and port. He managed to destabilize the British position which had been left poorly defended. This is in part based on Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Thursday, September 06, 2012
The challenges posed by Crete
The Germans saw Crete as an important target for conquest. Perhaps the primary motivation was to rob the Allies of an airbase within easy striking distance to the Rumanian oil fields. Crete was also relatively close to the new battleground in Cyrenaica. Since a purely naval assault of Crete seemed too risky, due to the concern about the Italian navy, an airborne assault seemed appealing. They had successfully used airborne troops in Holland and against Corinth in Greece. They could combine that with ferrying troops and equipment to Crete from Greece using small ships. They did not need to solely rely upon paratroops, because they had the ability to ferry troops using Ju-52 transports, if they could secure the necessary landing fields.
The British were concerned about defending Crete from an airborne attack, given the recent successful use of airborne troops by the Germans against the Corinth canal. The concern with holding North Africa against attack that was now commanded by Rommel was the primary concern. The primacy of that effort meant that insufficient forces would be available for defending Crete. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.