Sunday, July 17, 2005
The Greek situation in January 1941
The Excess Convoy was the Royal Navy's first taste of operating under strong air attack in the Mediterranean Sea
The best Italian bomber aircraft that the British had to deal with was the SM79 torpedo bomber. When that was augmented by Ju88 and Ju87 divebombers, the British quickly found themselves in trouble. In addition, the mining effort was a continuing danger. The Royal Navy in the Mediterranean Sea was as competent a force as any in world in dealing with air attacks. They had the advantage of having Admiral Cunningham as fleet commander. During early 1941, the Italian fleet, particularly the battlefleet was a danger. The British had nothing to compare with the new Italian battleships, such as the Vittorio Veneto. The rebuilt ships such as the Conte di Cavour and Andrea Doria were also a threat, even though they were not as strong.
The five Excess convoy ships stopped at Gibraltar, before making the run to Malta and Greece. They were delayed while repairs were made to the Renown. The Essex was the ship for Malta. The cargo included 12 Hurricanes in crates. On the night of January 1st, the Northern Prince was stranded as the result of a storm. The 400 troops were taken off and distributed to the AA cruiser Bonaventure and the destroyers. They ship was refloated, but had to turn back.
The Mediterranean Fleet had sailed from Alexandria in what became the standard pattern for running convoys through to Malta. They escorted to more ships bound for Malta, the Breconshire and Clan Macaulay. Concurrently, two convoys, one fast and one slow, had set sail from Malta headed east.
In a foretaste of what was to come, the Royal Navy was suffering under the new scale of air attacks. The cruiser Southampton was disabled and had to be scuttled with torpedoes on January 11th. The aircraft carrier Illustrious was damaged, and this would hamper the Royal Navy's ability to operate in the central Mediterranean. Still, the convoys all passed through without loss.
Saturday, July 16, 2005
Hitler's proposal to Mussolini
Friday, July 15, 2005
The Long Range Desert Group in early 1941
Thursday, July 14, 2005
The Fezzan operation
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
Aircraft in Malta on December 31st, 1940
- No. 830 Squadron Fleet Air Arm: 12 Fairey Swordfish torpedo bombers
- No. 261 Squadron RAF: 16 Hurricanes, plus 4 in reserve
- No. 148 Squadron RAF: 16 Wellingtons, plus 4 in reserve
- No. 228 Squadron RAF: 4 Sunderland flying boats, plus 2 in reserve
- No. 431 Flight RAF: 4 Martin Maryland maritime reconnaissance aircraft ("Glenn Martins") with one in reserve. Eventually, this became No. 69 Squadron
More about the fall of Tobruk, and a correction
Tuesday, July 12, 2005
The initiation of the Long Range Desert Group
Monday, July 11, 2005
More about the capture of Tobruk
Sunday, July 10, 2005
"By early afternoon, 13th Corps was once more counting booty..."
The Tobruk defences
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Correlli Barnett says that General O'Connor had a plan to conquer the rest of Libya by the end of February 1941
Another view of the capture of Tobruk in January 1941
Friday, July 08, 2005
The 7th Armoured Division in January 1941
Thursday, July 07, 2005
Supplies held up the attack on Tobruk
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
The Greek campaign started to impact Compass in January 1941
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
After Bardia, Tobruk (January 1941)
Monday, July 04, 2005
The capture of Bardia
- 400 guns
- 13 medium tanks
- 117 light tanks
- 200-300 vehicles
Sunday, July 03, 2005
The assault on Bardia on January 3rd, 1941
Saturday, July 02, 2005
The Australians established themselves near Bardia, starting in late December 1940
The commanders-in-chief decided to give Compass the priority on December 26th, 1940
Friday, July 01, 2005
The water shortage during Compass (December 1940)
Thursday, June 30, 2005
By mid-December 1940, the focus had shifted to Bardia
Wednesday, June 29, 2005
The arrangements after December 11th, 1940
- 38,300 Italian and Libyan prisoners
- 237 guns
- 73 tanks (L3/33, M11/39, and M13/40)
- More than 1000 vehicles
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
The results of December 11th and 12th, 1940
Monday, June 27, 2005
December 11th, 1940 Operation Compass
Sunday, June 26, 2005
British Armour on December 9th and 10th, 1940
Saturday, June 25, 2005
After the fall of Camp Nibeiwa
Friday, June 24, 2005
The Official History has some good photos from December 1940
The assault on Camp Nibeiwa
Thursday, June 23, 2005
A small tidbit about the attack on Bardia in January 1941
Another look at the initial operations in Compass
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
The experiment with mixed squadrons in October and November 1940
Mid-October 1940: decisions about air strength in the Middle East
Even in 1940, the Germans were preparing to intervene in North Africa
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
The air component of Operation Compass
Reinforcements, temporarily, for the 11th Hussars
Air reinforcements for Malta in early October 1940
Monday, June 20, 2005
Air power to be sent to Greece: late 1940
Sunday, June 19, 2005
June 11, 1940 and beyond
The British put out a covering force to be ready for the commencement of hostilities with Italy. The 11th Hussars, equipped with Morris AC9 and Rolls Royce Model 1924 Mk.I armoured cars, were spread out across the desert as much as 40 miles from the coast on June 11th. That night, they crossed the border and took surprised Italian outposts that weren't aware that war had been declared. The 7th Hussars and 1st/KRRC moved up to the border, and on June 14th, took Fort Capuzzo. Fort Maddalena fell to the 11th Hussars. On the 16th, a squadron of the 7th Hussars and J Battery, RHA, routed a column of 17 Italian light tanks, guns, and infantry and captured all the tanks.
As early as June 11th, the Italians commenced bombing Malta. Malta had never received the planned AA artillery outfit. Instead of 112 heavy and 60 light AA guns, they only had 34 heavy and 8 light. They did have the famous three Gladiators named Faith, Hope, and Charity.
Saturday, June 18, 2005
The Western Desert
The RAF was active following the commencement of war with Italy
Friday, June 17, 2005
Count Ciano on the Italian ultimatum to Greece in 1940
On August 15, 1940, Italy attacked Greece
Thursday, June 16, 2005
RAF planning in early August 1940
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Air Chief Marshal Longmore's srequirements in 1940
- 12 Hurricanes
- 12 Blenheim IVs
- 6 Lysanders
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
The Italian attack on September 13, 1940
On September 13, 1940, the Italians attacked British forces in Egypt. They bombarded Musaid with artillery, and then advanced up the coast road. The British had expected the Italians to outflank them from the desert, but the Italians were concerned that the British were more at home in the desert than they were, so they didn't make the attempt. Count Ciano wrote that "Never has a military operation been undertaken so much against the will of the Commander" (quoted in the Official History). He was writing about Marshall Graziani.
British opposition was limited to the following units:
- 3rd Coldstream Guards,
- C Battery RHA
- later, a portion of F Battery, RHA
- one section of 25/26th Medium Battery, RA
- one company 1/KRRC
- 1 machine gun company from 1st Royal Northumberland Fusiliers
Monday, June 13, 2005
Major-General Percy Hobart
Correlli Barnett criticizes Major-General Percy Hobart as the source of the mistaken idea that "tanks should fight other tanks". That was not the German way, although they often did fight other tanks, at least on the Eastern Front and later, on the Western Front, after there was one. Rommel used the "Sword and Shield" approach where armour was the sword and the shield was his anti-tank weapons. The 88mm FLAK36 was his key weapon in the shield, although the 50mm PAK38 was also highly effective, at least against the British cruiser tanks that Rommel's forces faced.
But Percy Hobart was a maverick and a champion of mechanized warfare. I would treat him better than Correlli Barnett. He was tossed out of the British Army by Archibald Wavell, after Hobart's commanding officer wrote an "adverse report" about him. When confronted on this incident later, Wavell could not adequately explain his dismissal of Hobart. This was the same mindset that later forced out Eric Dorman-Smith, another mechanized warfare expert.
Through the efforts of Winston Churchill, Hobart was returned to the army, although only in an organizing and training role, for which he was well-suited.
Trevor Constable has a paper about Hobart in the Journal of Historical Review. I have drawn upon that, as well as Correlli Barnett, in my discussion here.
Sunday, June 12, 2005
Operation "Brevity"
The Tiger Convoy ships (May 1941)
There are some good websites about the war in the Western Desert in 1940-1943
- 135 Matildas
- 82 Crusader tanks
- 21 light tanks (I believe that these were Lt.Mk.VIC's)
Saturday, June 11, 2005
British tank strength in Egypt in September 1940
Operation Hats in August 1940 and other reinforcements for the Middle East
- 3rd Hussars with light tanks
- 2nd battalion of the Royal Tank Regiment with cruiser tanks
- 7th battalion of the Royal Tank Regiment with 50 infantry tanks
- 48-2pdr anti-tank guns
- 20-Bofors 40mm light anti-aircraft guns
- 48-25pdr guns
- 500 Bren guns
- 250 0.55in Boys anti-tank rifles
- 50,000 anti-tank mines
- 300 tons of spare parts and equipment
Friday, June 10, 2005
Correlli Barnett referred to General Godwin-Austin as an "eighteenth century kind of general"
This should be helpful
Thursday, June 09, 2005
December 1940 in Libya
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Operation Compass in December 1940
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
The race to Sidi Barrani
Monday, June 06, 2005
The situation in February 1941
Sunday, June 05, 2005
General Cunningham in East Africa in early 1941
Saturday, June 04, 2005
Russians had a much better sense of what a tank should be like in 1939-1941
Friday, June 03, 2005
Rommel's initial reaction to Crusader
For the first time British and Empire troops will meet the Germans with an ample supply of equipment in modern weapons of all kins [sic]. The battle itself will affect the whole course of the war. Now is the time to strike the hardest blow yet struck for final victory, home and freedom. The Desert Army may add a page to history which will rank with Blenheim and Waterloo. The eyes off all nations are upon you. ALl our hearts are with you. May God uphold the right!
Correlli Barnett wrote that Cunningham was not fit to command, as he was near a nervous breakdown, from the strain of combat since February. Being thrust into an unfamiliar environment, mobile warfare in the desert, simply increased the strain.
Thursday, June 02, 2005
The 8th Army at the start of the Crusader battle
The 8th Army was deployed, ready to attack, by late November 15, 1941. They had about 100,000 troops at the ready, along with 453 cruiser tanks (or equivalent) with the 7th Armoured Division. 166 of these were American M3 Stuart tanks with only the 37mm gun. The rest were mostly Crusader I and II tanks with the 40mm 2pdr gun. There were still a few A13 Cru.Mk.IV and Cru.Mk.II tanks, but they left the scene after Crusader. The American Stuart tanks could make 40mph, if they were ungoverned, but along with the Crusaders, they had governors to increase their mechanical life and reliability.
British intelligence thought that the opposing forces had 272 German tanks and 138 Italian tanks. Of the German, they thought that there were as many as 96 Pzkw II's, with only a 20mm gun. The British assumed that there would be an "armour-to-armour" battle, and that they had superior forces. To bring the Germans to such a battle, the British intended to occupy a position that would bring Axis forces to counterattack. At 6am on November 18th, the 8th Army set out around the Axis flank. They crossed "The Wire" south of Bir Sheforzen, headed towards Gabr Saleh, and then to Bir Gubi and the airfield at Sidi Rezegh. As they moved forward, the British command was perplexed that Rommel had not responded. What did they have to do to bring Rommel into a battle?
This is based on Correlli Barnett's book, The Desert Generals, augmented with what I know from other sources.
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Correlli Barnett said that Battleaxe was the antithesis of Sidi Barrani
Tuesday, May 31, 2005
More about Operation Battleaxe
Monday, May 30, 2005
The aftermath of "Battleaxe"
Sunday, May 29, 2005
The impression taken away from Greece (in 1941)
Saturday, May 28, 2005
April 25, 1941 in Greece
Friday, May 27, 2005
There is an interesting story about Eric Dorman-Smith
Thursday, May 26, 2005
O'Connor hoped that the victory at Beda Fomm would gain him permission to take the rest of Libya
The odds were stacked against him, but General O'Connor hoped that winning at Beda Fomm would gain him permission to advance further. The Italians were is disarray, and had taken considerable losses in the process. They had lost 20,000 prisoners, 112 medium tanks (M11/39 and M13/40), 216 guns, and 1500 cars and trucks.
The problem was Greece. Churchill was eager to go into Greece and to help them fight Germans, if and when they were attacked. Churchill warned General Wavell that his overriding priority needed to be to aid Greece and possibly Turkey. He was to halt his advance into Libya, so that he had resources to send to the Balkans. Just possibly, O'Connor might have been able to advance far enough to forestall any German reinforcements, but it was not to be. Within a month, Rommel, and his advance forces, were in Libya, scouting out the British positions.
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
What happened in early 1941 was incomprehensible
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Churchill could not resist fighting Germans, so he jeopardized the North African front
"Neither of these [action in the Sudan or the Dodecanese] ought to detract from the supreme task of inflicting further defeats upon the main Italian army." (quoted in Correlli Barnett's The Desert Generals).
The Germans planned to go into Greece from Bulgaria, although not until March 1941. They were on a tight timetable, as the plans for attacking Russia in June were quite advance. To Churchill, defending Greece became more important than holding the gains in North Africa. He was ready to pull strong forces out of Libya and send them to Greece,w there they were expended, with only a portion being retrieved.
Monday, May 23, 2005
Churchill apparently felt that he had to contest every German attack
Sunday, May 22, 2005
More about the British withdrawal from Greece
The army depended on the navy for being able to evacuate Greece in later April 1941. The RAF was pursuing an independent plan, as the situation went into collapse. As long as they could use airfields near Athens, they flew out the pilots and technicians. When the Blenheims were moved to Crete, they took as many as they could. Others were flown out by No.216 and 267 squadrons flying Bombays and Lockheed Lodestars. Flying boats, probably Sunderlands, were also used. The Wellingtons had already been withdrawn, s they were too vulnerable on the ground. Remaining RAF personnel would leave with the army.
The army plan was to move at night, as the Germans were not operating at night, to the relief of the British. Troops would move into position during the dark, and hide. Towards night, they would destroy equipment that they planned to abandon, and then move to the beach. Admiral Pridham-Whipple's force included the amphibious transports Gelnearn and Glengyle, which were equipped with landing craft. There were also 19 troopships and four "A-lighters". The A-lighter was an early LCT.
The ANZAC corps had been in a defensive position at Thermopylae since 19 April.
As the situation progressively got worse, partly due to the collapse of the Greek army, German air dominance became increasingly a factor. Not only did it complicate the withdrawal, but over the next month wrote off many of the Royal Navy's assets in the Eastern Mediterranean.
This is from Vol.II of the official history.
Saturday, May 21, 2005
The defense of Post 11 at Bardia
Friday, May 20, 2005
Operation Battleaxe: a lost opportunity
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Truck shipments to the British in the Middle East in 1941
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Auchinleck's strategy at the First Alamein
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
More consideration of General Auchinleck and Montgomery
General Claude Auchinleck had gained his military experience largely in India. He was born in Northern Ireland (Ulster), and graduated from Sandhurst at the age of 20. That may explain his affinity for Eric Dorman-Smith, another Irishman. He joined the 62nd Punjab Regiment, after graduation and served in the Middle East. In 1933, he had served with Harold Alexander, fighting tribesmen and imposing order. He commanded the abortive operation at Narvik, after which Winston Churchill criticized him as being too cautious. That didn't stop Churchill from appointing Auchinleck to succeed Archibald Wavell as the theater commander in the Middle East and North Africa. Churchill was forever hounding his commanders to fight, as Churchill's political situation demanded action, often before his forces were ready.
The charge that Auchinleck made poor choices in his subordinate commanders is certainly valid. One defense was the lack of talent available, but that does not excuse him from what we see in hindsight as indefensible choices. Alan Cunningham simply did not have the relevant experience to be successful. His entire time in command of the 8th Army was so stressful to him that he was physically and mentally exhausted by the time he was relieved by Auchinleck. Neil Ritchie was a stolid organization man without any apparent original thoughts or ability. He was suitable as someone to take orders, not to be the key decision-maker.
The irony is that Bernard Law Montgomery was even more cautious than Auchinleck, and delayed the next offensive beyond the date that had been planned by Auchinleck. Unlike Auchinleck, Montgomery could only win with overwhelming forces, unimaginably applied. He came close to misfiring at the Second Alamein. The things that allowed him to prevail were his material superiority and the extreme difficulty with supplies that the Axis forces experienced. That allowed Montgomery to wear down Rommel's army until he was forced to withdraw them. Montgomery made such a feeble pursuit that he was never able to catch Rommel's army until they reached Tunisia, when they had no place to go.
Monday, May 16, 2005
General Ritchie planned to stake the entire Middle Eastern Theater on the battle at Mersa Matruh, circa June 25th, 1942
Sunday, May 15, 2005
The Boys anti-tank rifle was suitable for sniping, as well
Saturday, May 14, 2005
One piece of trivia is that the Australian 6th Cavaly regiment manned M11/39 tanks at Tobruk in January 1941
Friday, May 13, 2005
There was almost continual pressure from Churchill on Auchinleck to personally take command of the 8th Army
There was almost continual pressure from Churchill on Auchinleck to personally take command of the 8th Army
There was almost continual pressure from Churchill on Auchinleck to personally take command of the 8th Army
Thursday, May 12, 2005
The turning point in the Crusader battle in November 1941
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
General Gott on German tactics, written after the Crusader battle
"The German will not commit himself to tank versus tank battle as such. In every phase of battle he coordinates the action of his anti-tank guns, Field Artillery and Infantry with his tanks and he will not be drawn from this policy"
The German superiority was based on their use of the 88mm AA gun as an anti-tank weapon. This should not have been a surprise, as they had used them in this role as early as the Spanish Civil War. Correlli Barnett says that just four "88'" were sufficient to block an armoured brigade.
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
The rearguard during the withdrawal from Crete
Small guns in 1941
Monday, May 09, 2005
British aircraft at Habbaniya, during the Iraqi revolt
- 32 Hawker Audaxes
- 8 Fairey Gordons
- 29 Avro Oxfords
- 3 Gloster Gladiators
- 1 Bristol Blenheim I
- 5 Hawker Hart trainers
Correlli Barnett on Auchinleck's failings
Sunday, May 08, 2005
The defence of Malta in February 1941
- 8 infantry battalions plus the King's Own Malta Regiment
- Two field batteries, Royal Artillery
- One beach defence regiment, Royal Artillery, armed with 3.7in howitzers, 6in howitzers, and 18pdrs.
- One Royal Tank Regiment troop with 2 light tanks and four infantry tanks (presumably Inf. Mk.II Matilda)
Saturday, May 07, 2005
The British colonial army was at its best in East Africa
Friday, May 06, 2005
Churchill vs. Hitler as supreme military commander
Winston Churchill had military training and experience. I often forget that he had command experience in France during the Great War. Before that, he had been looking for opportunities to command in the field. He had many abilities besides being a naval administrator. When the situation had collapsed in May 1940, Winston was the obvious choice to lead the country.
Hitler lacked Churchill's experience and flare for the Supreme Commander role. That Germany did as well as they did was due to a number of factors. First was the dynamic and forward thinking army. There was some uneven quality, even in the German Army, but you saw giants like Field Marshall van Manstein, Has Guderian, and Rommel, to name a few. The second factor was their ability to produce technologically superior weapons. They often continued to use inferior hardware, but they could go from an army still equipped with Pzkw I's to the Panther in a short period. A feature of the early 1940's was that new weapons and technology could be developed quickly.
What Churchill particularly had was a high-level strategic vision. Hitler was more driven by politics and opportunism. You could argue that eventually, Germany would need to take out Russia, and June 1941 caught Russia in chaos. The German stroke came close to succeeding. Only the vast spaces and the work of some key generals saved them from defeat in the first few months. As it was, they lost large numbers of soldiers, mostly as prisoners of war, and immense quantities of equipment captured or destroyed.
Germany, though, under Hitler's leadership, was playing a gigantic Risk game. In 1942, they pushed as far as they could, until lack of resources and poor leadership at the highest level (Hitler's interference) dashed any hopes of success. Field Marshall von Manstein tried to rescue the situation, it was lost in the decision to tie up an army in Stalingrad. Improving Russian leadership, equipment, and manpower had grown strong enough to stop the German tide, and cause it to recede.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
I still have a large amount of unpublished material from the 1970's and 1980's
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Greg Costikyan has a review of "World at War"
World at War is actually a bit of a departure for Grigsby; he tends more toward big, long-lasting, complicated games, and World at War is essentially "Axis & Allies done historical." That is, it features areas rather than hexes, representational units rather than historical ones, a system vastly simpler than most of his games, and total playtime of maybe 4 hours, rather than 20+. In other words, it's clearly an attempt to make an historical wargame that might appeal to a wider audience.
Greg concludes:
If I were conceiving this product from inception (with, to be sure, the advantage of hindsight, of being able to see it already working, which the developers surely did not), I'd say: Not only do we need to simplify this UI as drastically as possible, we also need a series of programmed learning scenarios, along the lines of your typical RTS, that gradually and slowly introduce players to new concepts. Scenario 1, take France, Crete, and for bonus points Egypt by Fall 41, and we ignore the damn partisans. Scenario 2, everything is frozen except for Western Europe, you have to take Gibraltar, and we make the partisans ultra-important. And so on.
As it is, your typical Axis & Allies player is going to find himself stumped by this game.
And that's a shame, because when you get down to it, it's pretty damned cool.
On the other hand--if you aren't daunted by the thought of reading a manual, and like the idea of playing out the whole of WWII in an evening in a reasonably realistic game, this may be just your thing. And incidentally, both hot-seat and PBEM multiplayer provided.
Buy it via directly download from the Matrix Games site. Why should the retailers get a cut?