Monday, July 08, 2013
Wavell and his staff make unrealistic suggestions late on 22 May 1941
Friday, July 05, 2013
The issue about mutilation and reprisals by German troops
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
The situation at Kastelli
Tuesday, July 02, 2013
General Ringel's plan for 23 May 1941 on Crete
Thursday, June 27, 2013
22 May 1941 from the German perspective
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Naval forces involved with the battle for Crete in May 1941
Monday, June 24, 2013
Naval operations in support of Crete on 23 May 1941
Friday, June 21, 2013
More developments on Crete on 22 May 1941
The situation on Crete was very serious by 22 May 1941. There were enemy troops now blocking important roads. A group commanded by Colonel Campbell attacked at Retimo, but was not able to completely clear the road to the east and west. The Germans were reported to be blocking the road to the coast to the south where reinforcements would be landed. Late on 22 May, the 16th Brigade headquarters and one battalion sailed for Crete on the Glenroy. The plan was to land them at Timbakion to remove the Germans who were on the road.
There was a lot of naval action around Crete on 22 May. A force of three cruisers with destroyers attacked ships between Heraklion and a nearby island. They sank one caique, the ubiquitous type of Greek small vessel. Ships were running out of anti-aircraft ammunition and major units were lost. They included the cruisers Fiji and Gloucester. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Nigel Richardson's father: Crete 1941
There is an interesting article in the Telegraph by Nigel Richardson that talks about his father and his fellows in the battle for Crete in 1941. The German invasion had started on Friday, 20 May 1941, as we know. One of those killed on 22 May 1941, which we have been reviewing, was a British spy, John Pendlebury. He had been an archaeologist and had the personal peculiarity of having a glass eye. Nigel Richardson was a member of the Northumberland Hussars. He had been evacuated from Greece when the campaign there was being wound down and the troops withdrawn. He ended up at Suda Bay, where many other soldiers were dropped by the navy.
Nigel Richardson notes that the area of Hill 107 has been a German cemetery. Hill 107 was the place abandoned by Lt-Colonel Andrew's battalion when they were in the process of collapse after being attacked while unsupported by the 5th New Zealand Brigade. The New Zealanders are commemorated by a street at Galatas named the Neozilandon Polemiston. At one spot in an alley, there is a gate made from a piece of a British tank.
Nigel Richardson's father made his way to Sfakia, as the battle gave way to withdrawal. He was one of the about 5,000 men who were left behind to be taken prisoner by the Germans. He spent about four years as a prisoner of war in Germany. This is based on Nigel Richardson's article and what we know from Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Monday, June 17, 2013
Other events relating to Crete on 22 May 1941
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
The situation Crete deteriorates during late 22 May and early 23 May 1941
Monday, June 10, 2013
Late on 22 May 1941 in the Prison Valley on Crete
Starting at about 3pm on 22 May 1941, the New Zealand 19th Battalion had attacked towards an old Turkish fort in the Prison Valley on Crete. They were repulsed with the loss of 12 men. In return, the Germans launched counter-attack towards Galatas at about 7pm. Kippenberger's troops immediately attacked the group. Some Greeks that were nearby, commanded by Captain Forrester, charged towards the Germans, yelling and screaming. That broke the German advance and they withdrew.
In the vicinity of the Maleme airfield, an attack had been planned, but when the New Zealand Division commander realized that there was a German group holding the coast road between the 4th and 5th New Zealand Brigades, he changed his mind. That evening, the decision was made to withdraw from the area near the Maleme airfield and to cede the ground to the Germans. The Australian Official History says that this was in recognition that the battle for Crete was lost. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Thursday, June 06, 2013
Were the Germans withdrawing? 22 May 1941 on Crete
At Brigadier Hargest's 5th New Zealand Brigade headquarters, there was a suggestion that the Germans might be withdrawing troops by transport aircraft. The suggestion was prompted by thoughts about German troops running to aircraft as they landed at Maleme. Someone had thought that the troops might be running to the Ju-52 transports to board them to be able to leave. The truth seems to be that the aircraft were landing under fire. Brave men were running to the Ju-52 transport aircraft to unload them as quickly as possible, in case that they would be hit by shellfire.
To test out the idea that the Germans were leaving, the New Zealand division commander, Puttick, ordered Brigadier Kippenberger to probe the enemy in the vicinity of the prison. The patrols encountered heavy resistance, indicating that the Germans were in strength, not reducing their forces. The 19th Battalion had also made an attack towards an old Turkish fort, but was rebuffed by a strong German defense. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Tuesday, June 04, 2013
The situation at Maleme and who was to blame (Crete 1941)
Monday, June 03, 2013
The 28th (Maori) Battalion on 22 May 1941 at Maleme
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Sandy Thomas on the defence of Maleme on 20 and 21 May 1941
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
The 20th Battalion on 22 May 1941
Monday, May 27, 2013
The New Zealanders in action on 22 May 1941 at Maleme
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
22 May 1941 at Maleme
Monday, May 20, 2013
The 2/7th Battalion moves west on 21 May 1941
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
The Greek plan to attack Valona in January 1941
Monday, May 13, 2013
German Strategic Objectives in early 1941
The 2/7th Battalion on 21 and 22 May 1941 on Crete
Tuesday, May 07, 2013
The Australians on Crete during 21 and 22 May 1941
Monday, May 06, 2013
Australians on 21 May 1941 on Crete
Friday, May 03, 2013
The German plan for Crete for 22 May 1941
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
In the prison valley on Crete on 21 May 1941
Monday, April 29, 2013
The German results at sea near Crete by 21 May 1941
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
The German plans for the second day in the attack on Crete
Monday, April 22, 2013
At sea near Crete on 21 May 1941
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
The planned attempt to recapture the airfield at Maleme
Monday, April 15, 2013
21 May 1941 from the Australian Official History
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
More about the first day in the invasion of Crete
Monday, April 08, 2013
Saturday, April 06, 2013
A different topic :Auchinleck versus Rommel
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
21 May 1941 in the morning
Monday, April 01, 2013
Paratroops near the prison on 20 May 1941
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
The force for Canea and Suda Bay
Monday, March 25, 2013
The West Group attack on 20 May 1941
Thursday, March 21, 2013
The German force deployment for Crete
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
More about the original attack plan for Crete in 1941
Sunday, March 17, 2013
General Lohr
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
The XI Air Corps
Monday, March 11, 2013
Airborne attack lessons from Crete
The Germans overreacted to the problems with the airborne attack on Crete and decided to not make such an attack again. I would say that at least Hitler misread the situation. Yes, making a daylight parachute attack on defenders who expect the attack does not work well. The casualties among German paratroops at Crete were high because they were dropped onto defending troops who then shot the paratroops during the descent. The Allies were so impressed by the concept that they formed their own airborne divisions, including parachute-equipped paratroops.
The glider-borne troops were much more successful. They were largely dropped and landed near, not on, the targets to be attacked. A few gliders were dropped too far at sea and were lost with their passengers, but most were able to land on the island. They were in numbers large enough to form cohesive units that were able to capture the airfield at Maleme. After the airfield was secured, transport aircraft were able to bring in a large number of mountain troops who were then able to overwhelm the defending force. The defenders were at a disadvantage due to the poor command communications systems. General Freyberg often was uninformed about the course of the battle, until the battle was lost.
The capture of the bridge over the Corinth canal in Greece in April 1941 was a good example where paratroops were used with the element of surprise. There was considerable secrecy involved (apparently), and the paratroops were dropped and caught the largely undefended area by surprise and took the bridge. To achieve a degree of surprise needed for the successful use of paratroops was why the British and American airborne troops were dropped at night at Normandy in June 1944. The operation still went awry due to the air transports totally ignoring the need for navigation. The paratroops ended up being scattered across Normandy in small parties, not able to reform units.
Now, special forces are dropped by parachute with an eye to achieving surprise and a degree of stealth. That is what is needed for any successful use of parachutists.
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
The German plan for Crete in 1941
Monday, March 04, 2013
Naval support at Crete early in the attack
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Retimo and Heraklion on the first day or so
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The battle for Crete was really lost on the second day
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Near Canea and Suda Bay
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Suda Bay on 20 May 1941
Monday, February 18, 2013
Late on 20 May 1941 on Crete
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Command on 20 May 1941 on Crete suffered from poor communications
Monday, February 11, 2013
The Galatas area on 20 to 21 May 1941
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
The rest of Crete on 20 May 1941
Monday, February 04, 2013
At dawn on 21 May 1941 on Crete
Thursday, January 31, 2013
The 21st NZ Battalion on the slopes: 20-21 May 1941
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
The 23rd New Zealand Battalion at Crete on 20-21 May 1941
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
In the afternoon near Maleme on 20 May 1941
Monday, January 21, 2013
The 22nd NZ Battalion at Maleme airfield
British intelligence predicted an attack on Crete by 17, 18, or 19 May 1941
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
The Germans attack on 20 May 1941
Monday, January 14, 2013
Crete, right before the German attack in 1941
Friday, January 11, 2013
Anti-aircraft gunners right before the invasion of Crete in 1941
Wednesday, January 09, 2013
British intelligence predicted an attack on Crete by 17, 18, or 19 May 1941
Wednesday, January 02, 2013
The troop deployment on Crete on 20 May 1941 was unimpressive
Monday, December 31, 2012
The New Zealand Division expanded on 14 May 1941
Friday, December 28, 2012
The plan for the invasion of Crete in 1941
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Shipping and Air Attacks on Suda Bay May 1941
Saturday, December 22, 2012
the sixty 25pdrs in Egypt in late May 1941
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The gunners prepare in May 1941 on Crete
Monday, December 17, 2012
The artillery situation in early May 1941
Friday, December 14, 2012
British political considerations and leadership
Monday, December 10, 2012
Right before the German invasion of Crete
Right before the German invasion of Crete, there were still some 14,000 Italian prisoners on the island of Crete. The British wanted to transfer them off the island, but the Greeks had hesitated, because they were concerned that the transfer might violate international law. In any case, the prisoners were still there when the Germans invaded.
A small number of reinforcements and equipment had arrived on Crete prior to the German invasion. There were about 2,200 marines and their guns and searchlights. There were also two British infantry battalions, 16 light tanks, and 6 infantry tanks. There were also sent a troop of 3.7in mountain guns. All this was helpful but insufficient to meet the attack that would be launched. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Thursday, December 06, 2012
The Greek King and Government
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
British air strength on Crete on 30 April 1941
The British air strength on Crete at the end of April 1941 was very modest. They were based mainly at Maleme, although one squadron was at Heraklion. The extra RAF personnel were flown to Egypt, consistent with the idea that only defenders should be kept on Crete. Everyone was agreed that Crete should not be allowed to be taken without a fight. The problem was that there were inadequate forces available. The air strength was as follows:
At Heraklion: No. 112 Squadron RAF with 12 Gladiator fighters
At Maleme: No. 30 Squadron RAF with 12 Blenheim day bombers
No. 33/80 Squadron RAF with 6 Hurricane fighters
No. 805 Fleet Air Arm Squadron with 6 Gladiator and Fulmer fighters
When you realize that this modest force would be facing Bf 109 fighters and Ju-88 bombers, you can see that this small air contingent was inadequate to resist a strong air attack in support of an airborne invasion.
Sunday, December 02, 2012
The Crete garrison plan on 8 May 1941
Friday, November 30, 2012
Dispositions for the defence of Crete: 3 May 1941
Monday, November 26, 2012
More about troops on Crete: early May 1941
The main British unit on Crete in early May 1941 was the "fresh" 14th Brigade. They had been the Crete garrison at the time of the Greek operation. After the Greek fiasco, there were also four units built up from withdrawals from Greece: the "Rangers, Northumberland Hussars, 7th Medium Regiment, and 106th ROhal Horse Artillery". There were also men from the mobile naval base, coast artillery, anti-aircraft units, and base units.
There were also some ten thousand Greek troops, of which only three battalions were of any value. The other eight battalions were just recruits. The 5th (Cretan) division had fought in Albania and had been lost in the Greek collapse. General Freyberg had hoped to help organize the Greek troops on Crete, but there was the shortage of arms, equipment and leadership that hampered the effort. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Friday, November 23, 2012
The Australian situation on Crete
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Troops on Greece in early May 1941
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The command situation on Crete in early May 1941
Monday, November 12, 2012
General Freyberg on 4 May 1941
Wednesday, November 07, 2012
General Blamey weighs in: early May 1941
Monday, November 05, 2012
What forces were on Crete? Early May 1941
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
General Freyberg in command on Crete
Monday, October 29, 2012
The situation on 29 April 1941
Friday, October 26, 2012
The Greeks on Crete on 28 April 1941
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The impact of the evacuation from Greece on Crete
In early March 1941, before the Greek situation had unraveled, commanders had foreseen the need to accommodate in Crete as many as 50,000 troops evacuated from Greece. By 17 April, the command in Crete had requested 30,000 "tents, clothing and blankets" for evacuated troops. Troops and civilians brought from Greece started to arrive by 23 April. By 25 April and immediately after, there were 25,000 troops brought to Crete at Suda Bay by warship. There were no tents or even coats for them. Because of the lack of preparation for what many had anticipated, time was lost to prepare defences on Crete. Men sat around, even in organized units that had arrived. There were no tools or any of the normal essentials. After the disaster in Greece, the men relished the time spent doing nothing but resting in Crete.
Once more senior officers arrived on Crete there was more serious consideration about how to prepare for the expected invasion. The existing garrison was positioned. There was a small air condition on the island. There were four squadrons withdrawn from Greece with six or eight Blenheim day bombers, six Hurricane fighters, six Gladiator biplane fighters, one squadron that flew in from Egypt with nine Blenheim bombers, and a Fleet Air Arm squadron.
General Wilson thought that if they wanted to defend Crete, they needed to increase the strength to a greater degree than General Wavell and the other commanders wanted. General Wilson thought that it was a mistake to try and defend Crete with inadequate resources, which was probably true. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Plans for defending Crete in April and May 1941
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Major-General Weston takes over on 26 April 1941
Monday, October 15, 2012
The Island of Crete in May 1941
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Events in April and May 1941
Monday, October 08, 2012
The Iraqi operation in perspective
Thursday, October 04, 2012
Wavell and Auchinleck
I was curious about General Archibald Wavell's background and how that compared with his successor, General Claude Auchinleck. Wavell's father was an army officer, in fact a Major General, and he grew up in India. He followed his father into the army. He quickly accumulated staff officer experience, although he distinguished himself in the Great War in combat and was awarded the Military Cross. He also lost an eye in the process.
General Auchinleck was much more closely aligned with the Indian army and his Great War experience was in the Mespotamian Campaign against the Turks. While Wavell learned Russian before the war, Auchinleck learned Punjabi. Auchinleck commanded troops in combat when Wavell was in a staff officer role. Between the wars, both spent time on half pay. Wavell became a Major General in 1933 while Auchinleck was promoted to that rank in 1935.
Before the beginning of the Second World War, Wavell was head of Southern Command in the UK. He was appointed to command the Middle East in July 1939. He presided over the successful campaign against the Italians in late 1940 until early 1941. That campaign was ended prematurely and in an unsatisfactory way so that Anthony Eden and Churchill's ill-fated adventure in Greece could proceed. Wavell tarnished his reputation in Greece and subsequently in Crete. The Germans, with Erwin Rommel in command, upset the situation in North Africa and that would eventually lead to Wavell's removal.
Aunchinleck was appointed to replace Wavell. We can imagine that he was chosen for his experience in the region. In many ways, Auchinleck lacked the skills to be theater commander. He would have been more comfortable commanding the army fighting the Germans. In fact, Churchill repeatedly urged Auchinleck to do just that. Auchinleck took his role as theater commander seriously and thought that commanding the army in the field would detract from that role. Only twice did Auchinleck take command, and in both cases, he outfought Rommel and saved the situation. Once was in December 1941, when Auchinleck saved the Crusader operation when his choice as army commander, Alan Cunningham, was exhausted after the whirlwind East African campaign. He was not ready to take on command of the army in North Africa, where he had no experience with armoured forces. The second occasion was after the surrender of Tobruk in 1942, when Rommel threatened to advance to the Suez Canal.
Wavell had a better eye for choosing commanders to serve under him, while Auchinleck lacked that ability. However, if you needed an army commanded in a tight situation, you wanted Auchinleck, not Wavell.
Tuesday, October 02, 2012
German aid for the Iraqi's
Starting on 13 May 1941, the Germans had aircraft based at Mosul and Erbil to aid the Iraqi's in their fight against the British. Three German He-111 bombers raided Habbaniyah on 16 May and were able to do considerable damage. The German aircraft lacked the necessary support, however, so there were only one fighter and one bomber still operational by 28 May.
The Iraqi anti-British group were upset at the lack of support by the Germans and Italians. The Iraqis wanted arms and gold. Apparently, any Arab revolt against the British needed to have gold, presumably to buy support. The Germans saw the Iraqi revolt as more of a political event, rather than a real uprising of the Iraqi people against the British. The latter might have actually received substantive support. This is based on the account in Vol.II of the Australian Official History.


